Sunday, August 12, 2012

YOUTUBE AND 'CHILD PORN'



"Google is the largest distributor of child pornography in the world thanks to their unwillingness to monitor their own content and their government lobbying to prevent regulations that make them responsible.

"'Do no evil,' my butt."

"There is a video of a 14 year old girl engaged in a sex act that is being uploaded to YouTube every single day...

"YouTube needs to police this situation, as they are contributing the distribution of child pornography in what is the largest case of distribution of such in our history."

I contact YouTube when child porn has gone viral.

Thumbnail

Very Fat Bikini Lady Dancing


by WorldsFunniestVideo  1 year ago  32,328 views


"A video was put together and uploaded by and for pedophiles.

" Irony of irony, it's marked as 'inappropriate for some users,' which means that someone reviewing flags at YouTube thinks adults should be the ones looking at preteen girls in their underwear."

"The video's description says that the girl in the middle is, "'he girl wavin her (smexy) a$,' which should be a tip-off.

"She sits in a dress with her legs spread, and about 30 seconds in starts rubbing her crotch. The comments on this video bear out exactly why it should be removed.

Thumbnail
YouTube

"The video's 'Significant discovery events' (under video statistics) show some channels that have linked to the video - including a couple that have similar content in their favorites."

"It seems that sometimes a video is flagged and reviewed, and for whatever reason - maybe the reviewer missed what happened, maybe the reviewer doesn't care - it isn't deleted; at that point some videos are apparently made un-flaggable.

"That is, it would seem that no matter how many flags it gets from that point on, nothing happens. Presumably the video is marked in such a way that the flags are automatically ignored."

YouTube not deleting videos that cater to pedophiles - YouTube Help

Thumbnail by tomTCserson  5 years ago  53,850 views

"Why are Youtube so slow acting on the Flag as Inappropriate. Children are being tricked every day into making 'foot fetish' videos.

"However, Youtube implicitly supports the perverts by refusing to take timely action after the videos are flagged, while the view counts increase faster than a space launch altimeter.

"In recent instances Youtube have also used the Adult Content indicator instead of deletion.

"Obviouly choosing to believe the registered age of the user rather than see they are obviously children. Can't can't see the irony in marking these videos for adult viewing."

Flag as Inappropriate response - YouTube Help

Old Women Gets Humped by a Dog - YouTube

youtube.com7 May 2009 - 45 sec - Uploaded by StupidVideosMedia
Old womens gets raped by a dog, REALLY FUNNY.

'Once a video is classified as sexually suggestive, it will be "demoted" on lists such as "most viewed" and "most favorited." YouTube says that its testing shows this will only happen to a few videos each day.'

Thumbnail
YouTube

YouTube comes hard on porn.

Some believe that "pornography is used to prime the individual to offend. An individual deliberately views child pornography immediately prior to offending. 

"Pornography is used in the short term to sexually stimulate the offender in preparation for offending."[36]

Thumbnail
YouTube

Some believe that "pornography has a corrosive effect. An individual becomes increasingly interested in child pornography, is attracted to images of increasing severity, and becomes desensitized to the harm victims experience. 

"Use of pornography in the long term may also increase the risk that the person will sexually abuse a child."[37]

Thumbnail
YouTube

Effects of Child Pornography - Center for Problem-Oriented Policing

"The Internet facilitates child sexual abuse in the following ways:

"It allows networking among child abuse perpetrators. The Internet facilitates a subculture of pedophiles, who may share information and tactics and support each other’s belief systems.[40]

Thumbnail
YouTube

"It may be used to seek out and groom victims. Perpetrators may enter children’s or teens’ chat rooms under an assumed identity to access and establish relationships with potential victims.[41]

Thumbnail
YouTube

"It may be used in cyber-stalking. Children may be sexually harassed via the Internet.[42]

"It may be used to promote child sexual tourism. Information is made available to help individuals locate child-sex tourism operators or to make direct contact with child prostitutes.[43]

"It may be used in trafficking children. Mail-order children are available over the Internet."[44]
Sources of Digital Evidence"

Thumbnail
YouTube

"There is legal ambiguity about whether ISPs should be liable for the material they carry (as are television stations) or merely regarded as the conduits for that material (similar to the mail service).[52]

"The end result is that ISPs’ legal obligations with respect to Internet child pornography are often unclear, and, for the most part, the emphasis has been on self-regulation."[53]

Effects of Child Pornography - Center for Problem-Oriented Policing

Perhaps Google should be liable for the material it carries.

11 comments:

Zoompad said...

Thanks for posting this Aang. I love YouTube, there's so much good stuff on there, but there is definatly something wrong with YouTubes moderators.

Anyone who tries to complain about the paedophiles on YouTube is likely to end up being the ones who the YouTube moderators flag. I have given up complaining about the paedophiles and people who like having sex with animals on YouTube because I just ended up getting flagged myself. The paedophiles gang up on anti child abuse campaigners, even the victims of child abuse, and the YouTube moderators seem to be strongly supporting and protecting them.

The paedophiles gang up and leave horrible comments on the anti paedophiles channel, then when they report it, nothing is done, but if they get angry (goaded into it by the paedophiles) and even just use us slightly strong language the paedos all report it en masse and that person ends up being flagged.

I did give the YouTube mods the benefit of the doubt and thought perhaps they didnt realise what the crafty paedophiles were up to, but when I complained to the moderators and tried to explain the nasty reply I got back persuaded me that they do indeed realise.

newsfan said...

Ironic they want to filter political views or views about news anchors but not child porn. http://www.lynnaluvers.com/2012/08/googles-copyright-filtering-causes.html

Anonymous said...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HtBPOMCHmk

Anonymous said...

http://omg.yahoo.com/news/military-sexual-assault-focus-youtube-series-175428932.html

Anonymous said...

http://news.yahoo.com/mumbai-protest-against-northeast-unrest-turns-violent-160435822.html

http://news.yahoo.com/egypt-president-orders-military-chief-tantawi-retire-153521631.html

Anonymous said...

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2187374/Al-Qaedas-brutal-new-weapons-Children-kidnapped-kept-chains-taught-suicide-bombers.html

Anonymous said...

Installing a meme in our collective heads is one thing and the potential for control is another. I have a feeling that this functions as an indiscriminate trap waiting to catch, well... everyone ideally.

And then down the line when a particular individual is deemed guilty of thought crime, what with having dipped their toe in the paedophilia waters (or even just having gazed upon them, it doesn't really matter - even an accidental visit will count as proof of guilt) whomever it is can be destroyed, guilty of the most heinous crime there is.

We see it over and over in the death cult. Everyone in power has done something that can be used against them - public shaming, resignation, sacking, even jail. It's a Damoclean sword poised above the head of everyone, ready to drop if they go against the programme.

Which is dandy, but imagine being able to have something similar on the entire population. Just in case, king of thing. What with the pedophocracy death cult's collective head already swimming in a sex-blackmail mindset I figure it would be beyond irresistible.

And sure enough here's youtube hosting kiddy porn visible to all and sundry. The more the better says the death cult.

Anonymous said...

PS. Here's a prediction: in the future we will see people being charged with paedophile offences with incontrovertible proof via google/youtube records that they did so, and yet I'll bet that the people who posted the stuff there to begin with will be untraceable.

And of course, nor will anyone at google/youtube be held accountable. "We host billions of videos and there's no way we can keep track of them all blah blah blah..."

Zoompad said...

Well, the Lord doesn't like paedophilia, and the Lord doesn't like innocent people being set up either, so if people decide to do stuff like that, they had better realise who they are sticking two fingers up at and fighting against, because if they are daft enough to take on the Lord God Almighty they're a heck of a lot braver than I am!!!

DaftAida said...

I wanted to email you but no facility on blog (excellent work).

Would you please give some focus to the 2012 London Paralympics as all the 'flags' are their for a culminating 9/11 FF.

Games commence on 29th August through to 9th September, with a bus mystery procession to officially close the games on 10th September. Suspect a three day series of events from 9th culminating in total lock down.

Larry Silverstein (Twin Towers) owns the Westfield Centre bang in the Zone of Stadium which is likely to contain a nuke Cameron was involved in stealing from South Africa. Will involve Stadium, Buses (heavily indicated) and tubes.

Thanks.

DaftAida said...

Hi,

Did my comment on London FF for 9-11 September London Paralympics get through to you?

If not, would appreciate your input on this heavily flagged event.

 
Site Meter