Saturday, September 10, 2011

MAHATHIR MOHAMAD BLOG ON 9 11

Mahathir Mohamad, former prime minister of Malaysia.

9/11 was not a work of Muslim groups, says former Malaysian Prime Minister, Mahathir Mohamad

From the blog of Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad

9/11 2001

As posted by Dr. Mahathir Mohamad on September 08, 2011

1. I had written in this blog that the attack against the New York World Trade Centre and the Pentagon on 9/11 2001 was not by Muslim terrorist.

It could have been by other groups.

2. In the Star of Friday 2nd September, a report by AFP, date-lined New York has this to say:

“For some Americans, the deaths of nearly 3000 people was not the scariest thing about 9/11.

It was realising who carried out the attack: yes, the American Government.”

3. I believe Arab Muslims are angry...

But they or their handlers do not strike me as capable of planning and strategising such attacks...

4. But consider the attack on 9/11.

The planning must have taken a considerable length of time.

The candidates had to learn to fly in tiny aircraft.

Unless they were already airline pilots familiar with big passenger aircraft, their pupil pilot licenses would not be of much help to fly the four aircraft to their targets which were not an the route of the planes.


5. Planning to hijack four aircrafts simultaneously would require great precision in timing and logistics.

One aircraft maybe. But four simultaneously!

I don’t think Arab terrorists from Saudi Arabia can carry out this highly sophisticated operation with such success.

6. Then there was the collapse of the two towers hit by the aircrafts.

They came down nicely upon themselves without toppling against the other buildings close by.

It looks more like planned demolition of buildings than collapse consequent upon being hit by aircraft.

7. But a third building also collapsed in the same fashion although it was not hit by any aircraft or by the collapsing twin towers.

What is the explanation for this untouched building collapsing upon itself and not damaging other buildings nearby?

8. Then there is the total disappearance of the aircraft which hit the Pentagon building.

There was no debris of any kind, no broken parts of the aircraft, no black box, and no human bodies flung into the surroundings.

Is it possible for an aircraft to vaporise totally after a crash?

9. And the fourth aircraft which was supposed to have crashed in an open field. Again no sign of any debris.

No big crater.

Did it vaporise into nothingness also. Did the innocent passengers also vaporise?


10. The American press is great at reporting incidents.

They will give full coverage, with great pictures sketches and detailed descriptions.

For months they would publish stories with revealing photographs.

They would interview the relatives of the passengers who died in the crashes.

But the American press was strangely silent about 9/11.

11. It is now the 10th anniversary of 9/11.

Bush lied about Saddam’s weapons of mass destruction.

As a result hundreds of thousands of Iraqis, Afghans and a few thousand of young American soldiers died, thousands more are wounded, maimed for life, suffering mental breakdowns.

Two countries have been devastated and fratricidal wars have become endemic. And still no democracy.

12. This is the legacy of George W. Bush. If they can lie so as to kill Iraqis, Afghans and American soldiers, it is not unthinkable for Bush & Co. to lie about who was responsible for 9/11. Human lives do not seem to mean much to Bush!

AFP

9 comments:

Anonymous said...

http://news.yahoo.com/yemeni-army-liberates-southern-city-al-qaeda-152904506.html

C

Anonymous said...

Dr Mahathir is stating the obvious, but he's one of the few politicians on this planet who have the courage to do so.

If you want to know who in particular is responsible, look at those areas in Manhattan that are currently under an intensely paranoid security lockdown.

According to reports, they're checking every car going into Times Square with checkpoints on Fifth Avenue.

Not that they care about unwashed plebs in Times Square.

It's more about the Rockefeller Center and JP Morgan Chase building, among others.

Now just idly wondering how much damage a handful of RPG-7 shoulder-launchers with thermobaric TBG-7V rounds would cause to David Rockefeller's nice apartment. Certainly wouldn't cost much at all. And you don't even need a car to carry them; a backpack's fine. How convenient!

Might be a good idea first to test them out on Rockie's security personnel. You know them: the ones who can't afford their own private army for protection. But don't test them on the NYPD video surveillance center near the NYSE: they're innocent people.

Or drop by Zbig Brzezinski's place in McClean, Virginia. However Manhattan really has an embarrassment of choice if you're planning to exact justice on terrorists: Rupert Murdoch, Hank Greenberg, etc, etc.

If you think I'm being ungentlemanly and impolite, try looking up some of the pictures of dead children in Iraq, Afghanistan. Or even the thousands of dead of New York, now celebrating one decade since their murder by their plutocratic fellow New Yorkers.

How many dead children is one David Rockefeller worth?

Give your answer to three significant figures. Show your working.

Anonymous said...

http://www.nypost.com/pagesixmag/issues/20080713/Powerful+Co+op+Boards+Gatekeepers+Fifth+Avenue

Murdoch, Zuckerman, Schwarzman, Lauder, etc.

Wow, the Upper East Side really has a high density of 911 terrorists.

And they've been conveniently packaged in a handful of buildings. So thoughtful of them.

They'd be excellent practice for the P-270 Moskit. Only social decorum prevents it.

Anonymous said...

This is really an excellent site for background on many of the criminals behind 911. Not sure I've seen it mentioned here before:

http://fedupusa.wordpress.com/page/8/

Anonymous said...

I'm no expert flyer, but today's modern airliners are actually quiet easy for a reasonably competent pilot to fly, you just need to know to move the controls slowly as a big plane reacts slowly. Like a truck compared to a car. A Jumbo is controlled in the air by a 4" wheel, laying flat under one hand. Turn that and the computer works-out how to do the turn, telling you if it's far too much for safe flight whilst it does the turn safely, for you. A child could do it. Take-off would be very difficult, not knowing how to set-up the plane, start it, taxiing to the runway is hard enough, but the only really hard bit is landing.

And the guys didn't hijack the planes until they were in the air ...and had no intention of landing...

'Learned to fly on tiny planes...'

One at least began flight lessons - his first ever - on a cargo-plane, 'as he intended to get a job flying one'. This is absolutely crazy, not allowed, but he paid good money! It was reported to the FBI and CIA, who ignored it.

I think the other pilots were actually fairly experienced, albeit not on such large planes, but as said, when cruising in the air not that hard to fly as such. Small planes toss around all over the place in the thermals, react instantly to the tiniest twitch. I would rest my hand on my knee with the tips of two fingers touching the joystick to steady it, and the plane. It would fly without, just 'wobbling around' a bit in the rough air, but straight and level, if trimmed right. I rather liked that, it made me feel part of nature. Jumbo's are so big and heavy you wouldn't notice even the tiniest of thermals. I felt how smooth they were compared to a normal airliner the first time as a passenger.

Coordinating 4 planes at once, not hard. They all hijacked the planes at the same instant using normal digital watches, accurate to a second. Navigation was one thing Atta was an expert at, he found out how to punch in the coordinates of the targets, taught the others, the planes flew themselves there on auto-pilot!

Only 'mistake' was not allowing for the time to target, hence all hit at different times, but maybe Atta didn't chance the news of the first hijack effecting the chances of hijacking the other planes.

The third tower fell as it was effected by the earthquake/atom-bomb like shockwave bang from the falling towers hitting the ground. It obviously wasn't designed for such things, the surrounding buildings were, or the shockwave through the earth was different there.

The towers folding like cards was a fluke. Twice? A fluke? Yes. If they had hit much lower down I think the towers might have fallen over to one side.

The Pantegon is the only weird one. Even if the plane burned due to all the fuel I would have expected more debris. The speed of the plane would cause the burning fuel to carry on in the direction of flight, up and over the Pentagon, the heavy concrete walls of the Pentagon would absorb a lot of heat, which would be biased upwards anyway. Not enough debris, for my liking.

Look at Concorde, all set to burn to a cinder but a lot of the plane and passengers was still there.

#

There has been a bomb-threat here in Gothenburg, out by the big Alfsborg Bridge in the estuary, an old disused industrial building now a 'modern art' gallery cum heavy-metal/rap-venue, oil refineries on the other side, nothing much else, but the police are good, have been waiting for it, grabbed 4 men. Possible previous attempts, too, arrested the 'wrong' people last time, perhaps got the right ones this time.

Blammo said...

Anon @ 2:09

Yes, some of the hijackers are indeed qualified pilots. I say "are" because they are alive and well, working for Saudi Airlines, after having miraculously survived the ordeal.

Now what I can't figure, is why someone would bother pushing the 'official' conspiracy theory here at Aangirfan.

Anonymous said...

Blammo,

One reason for the long comment defending the official conspiracy theory is to draw attention away from the other comments.

In particular, those comments where I suggest paying a visit to the real terrorists in the Upper East Side.

This is the first time I've ever seen a comment on Aangirfan defending the official conspiracy theory with such assiduity. Ever. And I'm not a big believer in coincidences.

The real terrorists may have very little in common with normal humans, but they are made of flesh and blood.

They are not invulnerable.

----
"If it bleeds, we can kill it."
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qlicWUDf5MM

JakJones said...

Yep hes right. There's only two types of people now.Those who know. Those who dont

eelamme said...

And Jak, I'm sure you're in the know. Bush did it. Ha, I can't even say it with a straight face. So, what's the deal? We have no enemies? Just the govt.? People, please.

 
Site Meter